Current:Home > NewsU.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules -Achieve Wealth Network
U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules
View
Date:2025-04-15 08:53:13
A federal appeals court will allow partial access to the abortion drug mifepristone while a high-profile federal case plays out, but with new limitations on how the drug can be dispensed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit says the drug, used in most medication abortions in the United States, remains approved for use up to seven weeks of pregnancy while the case is being appealed.
Previously, the drug was approved for up to 10 weeks. The ruling also says mifepristone can no longer be sent in the mail at least for now.
The Biden administration says it will appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk sided with anti-abortion rights groups that sued the Food and Drug Administration over its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. He issued a ruling that would invalidate the drug's approval beginning this Friday unless the appeals court intervenes.
On Monday, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit for an emergency stay of Kacsmaryk's decision while the court hears the case. In their request, Justice Department lawyers argued that "the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA's approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court's own misguided assessment of the drug's safety."
Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and is now used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, in nearly all medication abortions in the United States. Mifepristone was initially approved for medication abortion through seven weeks of pregnancy, but in 2016, the FDA expanded that to 10 weeks.
The appeals court's decision means mifepristone will continue to be at least partially available while the case plays out.
It's unclear how the latest decision will interact with a ruling in a separate federal case in Washington state, filed by attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia who are seeking to preserve access to the pills.
In that decision, also issued Friday shortly after Kacsmaryk released his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice said the FDA was prohibited from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone."
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, one of the leaders of that effort, told NPR he believes it will preserve access to mifepristone for people in those 17 states and D.C., unless a higher court says otherwise.
The Justice Department also filed a motion Monday asking Rice to clarify the meaning of his ruling, given there appears to be "tension" with Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunction.
On Thursday evening, Rice issued an order affirming that for the 17 states and D.C. — the parties in the case before him — access to mifepristone should remain unchanged, regardless of the Texas judge's injunction and the Fifth Circuit's decision. So these cases remain on a collision course.
A Supreme Court decision could clarify the path forward.
Meanwhile, several states led by Democratic governors have begun stockpiling abortion pills — either mifepristone or another drug, misoprostol. Misoprostol is usually used in combination with mifepristone but can be used alone to induce abortion.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have announced that their states have begun stockpiling mifepristone in the event that access is disrupted. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say their states are stockpiling tens of thousands of doses of misoprostol.
veryGood! (1473)
Related
- Bodycam footage shows high
- New York's subway now has a 'you do you' mask policy. It's getting a Bronx cheer
- Electric Car Bills in Congress Seen As Route to Oil Independence
- Whatever happened to the Malawian anti-plastic activist inspired by goats?
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Whatever happened to the new no-patent COVID vaccine touted as a global game changer?
- Fortune releases list of top 10 biggest U.S. companies
- Joran van der Sloot, prime suspect in Natalee Holloway case, to be transferred to U.S. custody from Peru this week
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Apple event: What to know about its Vision Pro virtual reality headset release
Ranking
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Tennessee woman accused of trying to hire hitman to kill wife of man she met on Match.com
- Resolution Opposing All New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Passes in Portland
- Juul will pay nearly $440 million to settle states' investigation into teen vaping
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Score a $58 Deal on $109 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Products and Treat Your Skin to Luxurious Hydration
- As ‘Epic Winds’ Drive California Fires, Climate Change Fuels the Risk
- As school starts, teachers add a mental-health check-in to their lesson plans
Recommendation
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
Kids Face Rising Health Risks from Climate Change, Doctors Warn as Juliana Case Returns to Court
4 dead in Cessna Citation plane crash near D.C. Here's what we know so far.
Michael Bennet on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Long COVID and the labor market
Resolution Opposing All New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Passes in Portland
The crisis in Jackson shows how climate change is threatening water supplies